Monday, October 21, 2019
Labor Relations Project and Presentation Essays
Labor Relations Project and Presentation Essays Labor Relations Project and Presentation Essay Labor Relations Project and Presentation Essay Labor Relations is a really delicate portion of a concern that should be decently reviewed and studied before implementing or altering a concerns behavior. Happy Trails is a moderate-sized company that is seeking to minimise cost to go on to function its renters with a cost effectual service. Unfortunately cost has to be reviewed in all possible ways and schemes. We will be covering a few of the advantages and disadvantages of unionising. A recommendation will be given to assist steer Happy Trails. A reappraisal will besides be conducted of the issues a brotherhood might raise during the forming attempt. The stairss that should be covered by the LPNââ¬â¢s will besides be presented. We will so show the labour pattern that the LPNââ¬â¢s should avoid. We will so rede the independent life place direction on what we feel they should make. We will cover the statements and defence the infirmary will lift to the brotherhoods forming issues. Then we will take a expression at what the company must make if they resist unionization. We will so see what unjust labour patterns need to be avoided by direction. We will finalise this paper by reexamining what activities Happy Trail direction should and should non prosecute in. Advantages A ; Disadvantages The deliberation to unionise. or non. is a complicated stance. There are advantages and disadvantages on both sides of the determination. With a determination to unionise. the LPNs would be protected and guaranteed rewards and certain work conditions. On the other manus. Unionizing instantly creates an inauspicious relationship between members and the employer sometimes out weighing the benefits. In the event that a group of employees has a community of involvements coupled with concerns about their intervention as an employee by an employer for any ground. the employees have the right under the National Labor Relations Act ( NLRA ) . ( Bennett-Alexander A ; Hartman. 2007 ) . Recommendation In this instance. the recommendation for the LPNââ¬â¢s would be to unionise. This would protect them from being over ( or under ) worked. insure that proper rewards and entitlements were established. every bit good as brand sure Happy Trails was non anticipating or giving RN degree attention through the lesser qualified LPNs. Stairss to Unionize For the group of LPNââ¬â¢s at Happy Trails. the first measure would be to reach the local health care brotherhood representative mentioned in the overview. This would be a perfect get downing resource for information. inquiries and replies. This is besides the measure in which the brotherhood should go clear about what issues are of import and expected to be addressed by the corporate bargaining. For the LPNââ¬â¢s at Happy Trails. their issues should be concentrated on rewards. minimal hours worked. overtime footings. benefits. every bit good as clearly understanding the range of their expected responsibilities. Second. the LPNââ¬â¢s would necessitate to make up ones mind to fall in an already established industry brotherhood. or to make a brotherhood of their ain. In either instance. a sufficient figure of mandate cards ( or request signatures ) must be acquired. and the brotherhood must be voted in during a brotherhood representation election. or by inquiring the employer to voluntarily acknowledge the brotherhood. The National Labor Relations Board supervises and the brotherhood election. and certifies the consequences ( Bennett-Alexander A ; Hartman. 2007 ) . The last measure is to win a strong brotherhood contract. The LPNs in this instance would necessitate to negociate rewards paid. overtime payment footings. benefits. and minimal expected hours worked. Any brotherhood is merely every bit valuable as the contract agreed upon. Unfair Labor Practices that should be Avoided by the LPNs By and large. most unjust labour patterns are committed by the brotherhood or the employer. The merely unjust labour pattern the LPNs should avoid is to non seek to hale their fellow workers to fall in the brotherhood. Should Happy Trails Oppose Unionization? Although unionisation of groups like nurses is typically non-traditional. over the past 10 old ages at that place have been many registered nursesââ¬â¢ groups that have unionized across the state because of the demand for their employment and the deficit of nurses. Because of the demand to hold every American be able to afford health care. accredited practical nurses are in demand more because of their lower rewards. Happy Trails should non oppose unionisation. There are many other health care installations in the country who are working with brotherhoods Happy Trails would profit by negociating with a brotherhood besides. Because of the unhappy nurses at Happy Trails. seeking to barricade unionisation would likely be the worse measure for the organisation take. Employees may experience that managementââ¬â¢s seeking to pull strings them and this can diminish employee morale. The nurses may travel to any of the other installations to seek work and representation by the brotherhood for better working conditions. If Happy Trails loses more nurses. it may be difficult to enroll new workers. Stairss to Defy Unionization Tacticss and schemes must be implemented in order to defy unionisation. One scheme that has been used in the yesteryear is to engage consulting houses. besides known as brotherhood fellows ( Bennett-Alexander A ; Hartmann. 2007 ) . These houses use methods that discourage employees from voting to hold brotherhood representation. This scheme is a dearly-won one and should merely be used if basic stairss are non working. One of import measure to avoiding unionisation is through employee dealingss ( Thomas A ; Associates. 2009 ) . Employee dealingss plans have the employees best involvement in head. An effectual plan will assist employee/employer communicating. which can assist decide any issues or dissatisfaction. If step one does non halt brotherhood forming. the following measure is to forestall the brotherhood from deriving employee support. Throughout this measure the company should inform the LPNââ¬â¢s of the cons of subscribing a brotherhood mandate card. If the employees are informed and feel valuable to the company they will be less likely to subscribe a brotherhood card. Information can be provided through meetings. letters. and bulletin boards. If an election run begins because 30 per centum of employees signed cards. the following measure is to decide any employee issues and to lawfully convert employees that their best involvements are served by rejecting the brotherhood. Happy Trails would necessitate to construct a strong run and reenforce the value of the bing benefits and the first-class on the job conditions. Arguments against Unionization by Happy Trails Arguments Happy Trails can utilize against unionisation include the followers: Funding the workersââ¬â¢ wage if a brotherhood exists Relationships between employee and employer may be threatened with a brotherhood Union dues paid by employees is taken from their payroll check The brotherhood can non vouch anything What unjust labour patterns need to be avoided by direction? a ) Management should non seek to command or interfere with brotherhood personal businesss. They should non seek to acquire their favorite/certain campaigner to be elected to the brotherhood office. B ) Management should non know apart against employees who join or is in favour of brining in a brotherhood. They should non know apart against employees who exercise their rights under the jurisprudence ( e. g. . ending. bumping. or giving hapless working agendas to such employees ) . ( Bennett-Alexander A ; Hartman. 2007. pg 666 ) degree Celsius ) Management should non interfere. endanger or keep their employees from exerting their rights under the labour jurisprudence statute law. for illustration. they should non state employees that they are non allowed to hold brotherhoods or they will be punished or terminated if they do conveying a brotherhood ) . vitamin D ) Management should non decline to dicker with the brotherhood. And they should non decline to dicker in good religion. Happy Trailsââ¬â¢ direction squad may prosecute in any figure of activities during the unionisation. Which of the following would you rede? Explain why or why non? Activities during Unionization Promote LPNs. offer fillips. and put some into leading and direction functions. Unionization can be a long procedure but is rather good for the LPNââ¬â¢s. Unions are typically formed because employees are unhappy with their wage. working conditions. or hapless benefits. For that ground the activity direction should prosecute in is to actively advance LPNââ¬â¢s. offer fillips. and put some into leading and direction functions. This is the best maneuver to utilize and could profit Happy Trails every bit good as the LPNââ¬â¢s. However. the company has to do certain the tactics do non interfere with the employeesââ¬â¢ attempts to unionise. Raises and chances must be given to everyone. non merely brotherhood protagonists ; otherwise the National Labor Relations Act ( NLRA ) could see the act as illegal and as unjust labour patterns. Equally long as the employer deals in good religion no jurisprudence has been broken. Tell employees salary additions must discontinue to finance the corporate bargaining understanding. This option is non feasible therefore I do non urge it. Using scare tactics and endangering to discontinue salary additions will make more injury than good. Strikes could happen. which would hold a negative impact on the company. The LPNââ¬â¢s shouldnââ¬â¢t feel like they are being punished for traveling with the brotherhood. Explain current employee benefits to the LPNââ¬â¢s. comparing them to brotherhood promises. Though this option is enlightening it is seasonably. There are cons to being in a brotherhood such as dues and possible work stoppages. Supplying information to employees could rock their determination particularly if they are non familiar with the brotherhood patterns. However. overall the brotherhood has benefited employees. which is why this method could be more uneconomical than effectual. Most brotherhood members have better benefits and pay than non-union members. The LPNââ¬â¢s are cognizant of the superior rewards and benefits other LPNââ¬â¢s in the countries have received hence there is non much to explicate. Threaten to shut installation due to brotherhood run Bing that Happy Trails is a wellness attention installation. shuting the installation would non be practical. It would besides be considered favoritism against employees if they closed the installation down due to the brotherhood run. The NLRA does non let favoritism against employees for take parting in brotherhood activities. By remaining unfastened. they have the upper manus and it would give them more chance to explicate the disadvantages of a brotherhood to their employees. Aid in circulation of antiunion requests. During a unionizing run an employer can non help in antiunion requests. Helping in this activity could be considered intervention by the employer. Participating in these activities is illegal and viewed as unjust labour patterns. Counter brotherhood exaggerated claims on circulars. We recommend the direction non to direct the circulars with overdone counter offers to brotherhood claims. The direction is non supposed to promise pay additions or other benefits if employees donââ¬â¢t fall in the brotherhood. ( Bennett-Alexander A ; Hartman. 2007. pg 673 ) And they are non supposed to electronic mail. station or go around any intimidating letters or cusps ( circulars ) . The direction can nevertheless give wage raises or benefits. but they have to give them all across the boards. non merely to the brotherhood protagonists. However. this tactic is limited if the direction decides to make this after the brotherhood has applied for the certification or has given notice to the direction to dicker its first understanding. State employees they do non necessitate to speak to brotherhood organisers. that they may vote against the brotherhood. and that the independent life place does non welcome the brotherhood. We recommend the direction to speak with the employees. and state them that they have the option to fall in the brotherhood. but itââ¬â¢s non compulsory for them to fall in. They can besides state the employees that the independent life place does non welcome the brotherhood. but if the employees vote for the brotherhood. the direction will follow the good religion bargaining understanding. Solicit employees to bespeak the return of their mandate cards. We would urge the direction non to inquire employees to return the mandate cards ( badges ) that mean you are allowing them go. Employers can non endanger to fire. lay-off or end employees for back uping or fall ining a brotherhood. Tell employees they may be replaced if they vote for the brotherhood. We would urge the direction non to state employees that they will be replaced if they vote for the brotherhood. That would intend the direction is endangering the employees. Management canââ¬â¢t threaten to fire. lay-off or end employees for back uping or fall ining a brotherhood. Entreaty to the employees to get the better of the brotherhood. We would urge the direction to speak with the employees and state them non to vote in favour of the brotherhood. The independent life place will make everything possible to raise the rewards and benefits every bit much as possible if the brotherhood is defeated. The direction has to be careful non to negatively act upon the employees against the brotherhood. The direction can besides state the employees. that if the brotherhood is organized. we will handle the corporate bargaining procedure with full religion and non follow any unjust labour patterns. The direction besides can province that we will follow precisely what the jurisprudence requires. Statisticss for brotherhood members in United States and California ( Statistics. 2013 ) : [ movie ] Decision When doing immense alterations that change an employees. benefits. wage. rights. and duties it is really of import and should be done really carefully. A company must retrieve how of import these alterations are to people and what issues could be created if the employees feel they are non being taken into consideration. When an employee feels violated they can travel to extreme step like going portion of a brotherhood. A brotherhood can go a immense load for a company and cost employees money. Many of the grounds why employees look at brotherhoods can normally be avoided and handled in house. Employees should besides retrieve that a brotherhood cost money and they should seek for a brotherhood that is worth their money. Unfortunately sometimes employees end up fring more than winning when they become portion of a brotherhood. If the people in the brotherhood are non making their occupation and looking out for all employees so they might merely be passing their money and non acquiring what they deserve. Mentions: Bennett-Alexander. D. D. . A ; Hartman. L. P. ( 2007 ) . Employment jurisprudence for concern ( 5th ed. ) . Boston. MA: McGraw-Hill. Ch. 14-Labor Law. Pg. 666 A ; 673. Labor Union Statistics. Retrieved on February 17. 2013. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. bls. gov/ro9/unionca. htm Thomas A ; Associates ( 2009 ) . Avoiding Unions. Retrieved February 18. 2013 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. employersattorneys. com/employment-law/California-employer-how-to-
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.